SPOT NEWS AND SCENIC PHOTOGRAPHY

SOUTHEAST TENNESSEE, NORTH ALABAMA AND NORTH GEORGIA

NEWS

Fire Scene Photos

Accident Scene Photos

MODELS & SCENIC

Members

Four Alarm Fire Hits Carpet Backing Company in Lafayette

  LAFAYETTE, GA – Sunday, March 30, 2008 – At about 4:00 PM, the Lafayette Fire Department was dispatched to 110 West McCarter Road for a reported piece of business machinery on fire. This is the address of Quality Custom Cushion, a maker of foam backing for carpets. While en route, a Lafayette firefighter told the dispatcher he could see a large column of black smoke in the area. Firefighters arrived to find more than a piece of machinery on fire and immediately began to make an attack on the fire that was now raging inside the large commercial establishment. A full commercial assignment was requested.

During the initial attack on the fire, a firefighter was slightly injured and was treated by medics from Hutcheson EMS. At this time it is unclear if he needed hospitalization but he was not severely injured.

Firefighters immediately recognized the need for additional resources and requested mutual aid. The initial call for mutual aid brought several fire companies from Walker County Emergency Services along with a ladder truck and battalion chief from Fort Oglethorpe Fire and Rescue. East Ridge, Tennessee Public Safety Director Eddie Phillips who is designated MA-1 (Mutual Aid 1) for the surrounding area was contacted and he struck the equivalent of a third and fourth alarm. This brought additional resources from Catoosa County Fire Department, East Ridge Fire Department, Rossville Fire Department, Summerville Fire Department, Walker State Prison Fire Department and the Hays State Prison Fire Department. In total, about 100-120 firefighters responded to the call.

Firefighters fought the blaze from several fronts. While some were able to make a limited interior attack, water from the master streams atop Fort Oglethorpe Ladder 1 and Catoosa Ladder 1 flooded the building from above. Firefighters were hampered in their efforts by the limited amount of access to the building and the large amount of fire inside. Access on two sides was limited to one door each. The C side of the building was only accessible from a large overhead door. The D side was accessible through several overhead garage doors but they were all blocked by trailers waiting for loading or unloading. One portion of the wall on the D side along with portions of the roof collapsed during the operation. The wall was kept from coming all the way down by trailers backed up against it.

Eventually when a large portion of the fire was brought under control, all crews were pulled out and the wall was allowed to completely collapse on its own. Firefighters then went to work removing all of the debris from inside that was still on fire so that it could be completely extinguished. Firefighters also then used foam to douse the fire.

Firefighters worked through the night and into the next day ensuring that the fire was completely out. No further injuries were reported. Chattanooga Hamilton County Rescue was on the scene for rehab. Total monetary loss is unknown at this point but almost everything inside the building was completely
destroyed. Early in the fire, firefighters were able to make entry into the front of the building which houses the office area and removed several computers and records for the owners. The cause of the fire is believed to be a piece of machinery that caught fire and then spread to foam stored in the building.

Hazardous materials crews and environmental protection officials were called to the scene to asses the damage and any potential hazards. Several different dyes and chemicals are used in the day to day operations of the plant and there was a large amount of runoff during the fight to control the fire.

Story by Steve Kellam

Photos by Bill Carson

 

 

 

 

MEMBERS AREA

START YOUR MEMBERSHIP

 

 

 

 

Website created and maintained by Carsonphotos

About me and Carsonphotos

 

Carsonphotos and it's reporters and photographers are not responsible for witness statements